Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effects of different immunosuppressive drugs on the periodontal status and changes in periodontal pathogenic bacterial flora in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Zhihai Wu1, Xuguang Yang2, Ning Li3

1Department of Stomatology, Lanzhou Anning District People's Hospital,Lanzhou, Gansu 730070; 2Department of Anatomy and Histology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000; 3Department of Stomatology, Gansu Gem Flower Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu 730060, China.

For correspondence:-  Ning Li   Email: 1004089564@qq.com   Tel:+8613567884556

Accepted: 24 September 2021        Published: 31 October 2021

Citation: Wu Z, Yang X, Li N. Effects of different immunosuppressive drugs on the periodontal status and changes in periodontal pathogenic bacterial flora in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(10):2219-2226 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i10.29

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of periodontal disease(s) and the associated bacteria among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with different immunosuppressive drugs.
Methods: Patients aged 18 – 65 years who had a 6-month history of RA, and were diagnosed as per the American College of Rheumatology and European League against Rheumatism, were included in the study. Supragingival plaque was removed by dentists. Using sterile paper strips, sub-gingival biofilm samples were collected from 5 of the deepest periodontal pockets. The samples were sent to pathologists for assessment. Polymerase chain reaction was carried out on them. Detection thresholds were >102 for Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, while the detection threshold for Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia, Parvimonas micra, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Campylobacter rectus, Eubacterium nodatum, Eikenellacorrodens, and Capnocytophaga species was 103.
Results: There was a higher number of patients with bleeding-on-probing amongst cohorts who received a combination of methotrexate and tumor necrosis factor-α antagonist than in those given leflunomide only (52 vs. 29, p = 0.041, q = 3.064), or methotrexate + rituximab (52 vs. 30, p = 0.041, q = 3.131, Fig. 1). Papilla bleeding index was lowest in patients who were treated with leflunomide. Almost all patients had dental infection with Fusobacterium nucleatum.
Conclusion: These results indicate that treatment of RA with methotrexate results in periodontal inflammation.

Keywords: Bleeding on probing, Dental examination, Methotrexate, Periodontal inflammation, Rheumatoid arthritis

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates